T120825020053
1 Love is expressed and becomes an expression that we can only identify with when we identify with our individuality and give it form.
2 For instance, when under intimacy, when real love is felt, one wants to give pleasure, and by giving pleasure, one feels pleasure of infinite proportion.
3 It is only when one identifies with the self that one gives it form and expresses it upon identifying with itself— and one discerns.
4 Love is also expressed when one identifies with the self through a relationship, such as that of a father, but sets boundaries as one identifies with the self.
5 It is my identification with the self that brings me to love my neighbor and the rest of the world. It is the identification of the self that gives it form: An expression identified with at a level of understanding of the self, with the I am—like saying, ‘I am her husband,’ ‘I am her father,’ ‘I am his son,’ ‘I am’ … this and that.
6 My relationship with the rest of the world is through the ‘I am.’ ‘I am’ is love expressed in different forms in the ‘I AM’ process of identification.
7 ‘I am that I am’ is me identifying with the self, which is love—an expression of love through the mindset created by the identification of the self, which is identifying with myself as this or that.
8 That is how that love-given process takes form. Love is an expression only through the identification with the self that love is directed.
9 FV—Why am I getting these messages while half-asleep? And why do I speak out loud?
10 CFKW—(*) It is love. Love is an expression that I identify with. I identify with it when I become the witness, and if I become the witness, it becomes credible in my mind.
11 It is an expression of love through the senses. It is an expression of love, understanding the nature of things, and wanting to know everything that is and exists, and I am compelled to pass it on to others. It is an expression of love, as the witness, seen as a third party, and to identify with it and find logic and reasoning behind it.
12 FV—Is it myself or someone speaking through me?
13 CFKW—I am that I am. Express yourself as I am expressing myself through others. It is an expression of love, wanting to express myself and identify myself as I become someone’s friend. I am the one who does this and that to help express my love, my giving, and my understanding.
14 I am the one receiving information. I am the one giving advice. I am the one learning— revealing this, showing that. I am the manifestation of love, the manifestation of anger, the manifestation of frustration, the manifestation of discord, and so on. I am the one who sees things one way or the other.
15 I am the one who helps, the one who does harm, the one who benefits from others, the one who benefits others, the one who seeks, the one who finds, the one who expresses love, hate, anger—I am that I am.
16 I am expression in form, in judgment— I am the one who receives and gives information away. I am the receiver of the information that is available, expressing it in form to reveal, express, understand, give judgment, draw conclusions to errors, and not to err.
17 I am that I am—the receiver, the recipient, the creator. I am everything there is to be, and I choose to be that I am; here, now, in this moment of understanding that I am the source of information through my understanding of things—how they are—the receiver, not to be judged for what I receive.
18 That is how I become the third party— the receiver, not the creator. I chose to be the receiver because I am the source of information, the receptor, the vessel of universal consciousness, which is none other than the understanding of how things work in this plane of reality based on the (*)limited form given to me by the source through my body, in human form, limited in information but very broad in knowledge and understanding. What matters is only how it is applied—for it is through this that the form I give may be understood. You see?
19 It is the understanding I’ve just received—the true meaning of love as expression and form, and how I identify with it to create: I am both the giver and the receiver. You see?
20 I err because I judge, but the information, given as it is, there is no way to be judged. It is clear—only interpretation not by the receiver distorts it and gives it a misguided meaning. But as the receiver, through consciousness, with a clear mind, detaching from my identification with the self is of true knowledge as the source comes into play.
21 Love is an expression. Identification with the self makes judgment and distorts its true meaning by identifying with the self and make judgments based on the scale of information that the self has as the recipient as he understands its place on Earth with the relationship it has with another other self.
22 For instance, when I say: ‘I am her husband, so I can do this,” I see my wife at a different level. But when I see someone else I do not identify myself with as such, it disturbs the true meaning of that love channeled through intimacy.
23 That is why identification with the self does not allow love to be transferred through intimacy when dealing with my identification as a father, as a son, or as a friend. You see? It is my identification with that particular emotion that brings the separation between lover and father or friend. You see now?
24 It is your identification with the self that makes that feeling of intimacy and gratification that takes place for one and the other, and is disturbed when one identifies as a father, mother, and the like.
25 That is why you can see a painting and say, ‘Oh, how beautiful it is.’ But if you get closer and it becomes something you no longer identify with on a deeper level, disruption takes place, and you can no longer identify with it as beautiful.
26 That is why you may be in love, only to realize it is not what you thought it to be, and you immediately cut off the relationship because your identification with what you wanted it to be gets disturbed for not being in tune with the same thinking.
27 Everything has to do with the identification of the self. I am that I am. I identify myself as a human, yet I identify myself as a spirit in relation to this world, and I identify myself as a man.
28 ‘I am’ also applies to the spirit. I identify myself as a spirit—and spirit becomes an individual—as self, as the son of the creator, as something that is part of something else that is identified with the self—identified as the self as something in relation with something else, as the spirit never dies and now finds identification with the self at this level of understanding.
29 It is through this level of understanding that the spirit finds itself in human form. As for the spirit, at other levels, that is unknown…at this level.
End of Transcript 120825020053
Annotations
Article 10— Here, I receive my answer in abstract form, and although I note that it comes from the CFKW, I am the one who describes it in words. Moving forward, I speak in an intertwining manner between the first and third person through non-dual awareness. It reflects the altered state in which I speak interchangeably as “I” (the one experiencing) and the Collective Force of Knowledge and Wisdom (who delivers the message) as I become aware of being both the doer and the observer as I transcend the limitations of duality by dissolving the illusion of separation.
Article 18— This response explains in more detail Article 9 from the First Transcript.