T120919093425
44 FV—What, then, is the Creator?
45 CFKW—For some, the Creator is the one who created you—someone to whom you belong. And because you belong to Him, He becomes your Father, and you become His son. You see? That is one interpretation.
46 Another interpretation is that the Creator is the Source—the energy that moves all things and is perhaps better understood from a scientific perspective. But who is correct? Science will claim to be correct, while the spiritual perspective will make the same claim.
47 But if thinking of the Source as ‘energy’ leaves you with a sense of emptiness, then turn to what brings you greater comfort and call it God—the Father, and yourself His son. Be content with the thought that you are not fully responsible for everything that is and exists. Therefore, you may rely on a Father who is the Creator, the one who created everything, including your thoughts. You see?
48 It is about having the freedom to give it whatever form brings you comfort, so that you may find peace within yourself and answers to your questions.
49 So you either move in one direction or the other, but do not allow yourself to be led astray by the thinking of others who tell you, “This is the way.” It is not THE way, but (*)A WAY—one of many ways to find peace within oneself, knowing that all answers will be given.
50 The problem with religion is that many become entangled in the role of victims of life. Those who embrace a spiritual, non-religious perspective may come to believe they are above the rest, while those who place their faith in science may see themselves as the ultimate authority in the search for answers. They continue seeking ever more ways to understand truth, drawing closer and closer to the smallest particles of creation, until some claim they have found God itself—the so-called “God Particle.
51 FV—But what does it matter if they claim to have found God through their way, and others have found God through another? Will both be happy? Will they not both be content?
52 CFKW—The problem arises when one of them tries to claim their truth. The paradox of life is that both have found it, yet neither truly has it. That is because truth, even in the spiritual world, is STILL relative truth. For one to claim to be right, the other must be wrong.
53 The truth is that there is no truth, only a thought. And a thought is true only when you see it as true. It becomes untrue only when it does not fall within the laws of logic, and even then, it is considered untrue based on one’s perception.
54 A thought is a thought, not necessarily true. Therefore, if a thought is a thought and not necessarily true, then what is truth if it begins with a thought?
55 FV—Which came first: the thought or the truth?
56 CFKW—The thought, for the thought gives life to truth, which gives you the ability to discern between two thoughts. That becomes your truth—your set of logic. You see?
57 FV—Why, then, do we live within this complexity of so many apparent truths?
58 CFKW—Because each has his own truth.
59 FV—What does that have to do with the law of cause and effect, with what happened to me and to all those involved?
60 CFKW—Because we are all involved in this—all of us. And that is why many become victims of circumstance, because we are all intertwined. Accidents do happen, and they happen the way they do because everything moves through the intentions of those with whom you are compelled to live, and through the collective thinking process that draws them all toward a common goal. You see?
61 All those who live believing that the world revolves around them because of their own self-absorption will have their way, their resources, and eventually their own cause and effect. You see? Cause is creation; effect (is) how to deal with it. Everything is cause and effect.
62 If you wish to see it from a religious perspective, then think of the Creator as the one who created everything that is and exists—and you may become the victim of your circumstances. You may see it any way you choose and in whatever form brings you the greatest comfort. It will all be up to you.
63 A thought is a thought, and the thinking process follows the path you choose to take. You may choose to view it as the religious deity you have been taught and led to believe in through your belief system. But if you ever feel that God is something greater, (*)move forward, because for you there will be greater things ahead. And for the one who feels no need to seek a higher truth, that is their choice as they choose to live and rest—and so be it.
64 It is humanity that places labels upon things, deciding which is right and which is wrong. I am not here to tell you which one is right or wrong. All I’m telling you is to choose. And by choosing, you come to terms with and find peace in your understanding of things, according to your way of thinking—but keep it to yourself.
65 And if others (the reader) resonate with this message, join me (CFKW) in this line of thought. Let us reinforce one another in our thinking and in the way we express things, so that others may also find their way through the insights we offer for them to follow.
66 People do not have to walk away from their beliefs in order to understand what you are trying to explain. That divide must come to an end. You may keep your religion; you may keep your beliefs. All I am asking is that you understand that one specific path is not the only way.
67 Seek answers so that you may continue moving (evolving), because if you do not move into different patterns of thinking, then when your mind begins to question itself, you may become confused within your own world, unable to find answers to your questions. And it is there that everything begins—confusion, depression, discouragement, dissatisfaction, not understanding how things happen, placing obstacles in your path, doubt, and the endless “what if” of things.
68 But if each person comes to understand what moves them toward a different way of thinking, and to experience life from all its different angles—from the spiritual-religious, to the spiritual non-religious, to the abstract nature of things, and from science to history as they shape life in a material world—then one begins to realize that within each of those worlds, life is still life. You see?
69 If, within the deeply spiritual God Father–Son relationship, my thought moves in that direction, then the perspective of a Father-Creator makes it true. But if, from the spiritual non-religious perspective, I recognize that I am (*)God, and I am (*)god, then I am creation. Therefore, I can move, I can choose my path, and I can shape my world. And in the material, physical world, I am life—I live, and I die.
70 Humanity moves forward through what it has left behind. And many call themselves creators because humanity will continue from what they have left behind. In essence, that is true because as they build their next life, they encounter what has already been built and continue from there as they strive to become better. So, (*)man is the Creator, living in a world of his own creation.
71 Many question how the original life was created, and they will continue searching, only to discover that there is a spiritual way that is very hard to trace. It belongs to the abstract, and they will never fully find it because it does not belong to the material world.
72 See science and its way of thinking: it claims that you evolved from a unicellular organism into a multicellular one, that you have only this single biological life to live, and that you are the architect of your own surroundings—where your ultimate societal purpose is to advance collective progress for the evolutionary betterment of humanity.
73 Take now the life of (*)Jesus. Because of his humility, he understood that the knowledge and wisdom he had acquired were due to his immersion in the knowing of his existence. He knew that even in the spirit world, he remained an individual being within the universal realm—a messenger who came down to speak the truth in the exact same way that we need to remind ourselves of who we truly are. And we sometimes need a slap on the back of the head to remind us not to forget what we have already learned, just like when you burn your finger on a candle despite already knowing that the flame burns, as a reminder. You see?
74 Same as the brake caliper clip that fell from the car to remind you to be more attentive to your work, your thought process, and your discernment. It is arduous (spiritual) work, for one does not know where things come from or why one is here. That is why there are so many questions.
75 One learns from within oneself, but one also learns from outside when thought becomes experiences—for it is through experiences that one learns. It is from within that one remembers. Remembering is the abstract, while living is the densification of thought.
76 Why do you think that in dreams you live them, you sweat, you cry, you become tired, you do, you undo… it is not a fantasy. If it were a fantasy, you would not endure it, nor would you suffer. It is only that, because you inhabit the spiritual world, you do not bring a cut into the material world, but yes, it hurts; yes, you suffer it; yes, the pain is the same. And it could not have been a fantasy because, if that were so, it would not hurt—but it hurts you in thought. You feel and suffer, you laugh, you cry, you even feel pleasures, because it is life. You see? It-is-still-life.
77 In those moments of spirituality, it is also life because you feel, you suffer, you enjoy, you are at peace, because not everything is running, walking, jumping, leaping—there is also resting.
78 But resting is not being at peace. Being at peace is centering yourself within yourself, in the balance where you understand things exactly as they are. When you begin to question, that is when anguish comes, but when you are at peace, understanding your surroundings by being compliant or submissive to what is before you, that is peace—peace and harmony.
79 But neither can you remain at peace for a long time, because when one is at peace, one stops, one holds back, because one rests and is at peace. Being at peace for too long is not good, because you affect others if others depend on you. You see? The essence lies in the dependence of others on you.
80 But if you are free and have no attachments, being at peace for a long time is not bad. But remember where you live—you live on this plane, where existence and coexistence must continue, and one works with energies, and one of those energies is money, which provides your livelihood.
81 Therefore, you cannot remain at peace for too long because one must work to earn one’s sustenance on this earthly plane. Because wanting to remain in the spiritual world for too long is of no use if there is no balance in the material world, for you live in both worlds simultaneously. To be here, you must be in flesh and blood; to be there, you must be soul/spirit. You see? Therefore, you must be anchored if you want to be here. If you want to be on your own, be on your own, but if someone depends on you, do your job, move along.
82 FV—What are we?
End of part 2 of Transcript 120919093425
Annotations:
Article 49—The capitalization is intentional. THE way refers to an exclusive or singular path, whereas A WAY refers to one path among many possible approaches to understanding and inner peace.
Article 63—This passage speaks directly to me as the transcriber, who was raised as a Catholic. CFKW’s guidance to “move forward” is a personal call for my own spiritual growth to fulfill this work. In no way does it imply or impose that readers must abandon their personal religious beliefs.
Article 69—This distinction stems from a message directed straight to the transcriber, who at that time was processing the guidance through the limited lens of their own established belief system. Here, “I am God” is limited to God as a deity, whereas “I am god” refers to the individualized divine spark within each being. Clarifying this difference was the necessary bridge to expand the transcriber’s understanding beyond the limits of their initial programming.
Article 70 —The Collective Forces of Knowledge and Wisdom use the term “man” in its purest genealogical origin, which carries no gender implication whatsoever. Etymologically, the word stems from ancestral roots meaning “human being” or “one who possesses a mind and the capacity to think.” Therefore, the word “man” does not refer to the male gender, but rather to humanity as a whole, as a conscious and co-creative collective. *(Source: Oxford Etymology; from Old English “mann” [human being/person] rooted in the Proto-Indo-European “men-” [to think]).
Article 73 The reference to Jesus is utilized here strictly as an accessible, universally recognized archetype of spiritual alignment and humility. This example was specifically drawn from my own religious upbringing to establish a relatable frame of reference, rather than to enforce or validate any specific religious doctrine or dogma. The underlying message transcends theology, focusing instead on the universal journey of conscious self-realization.