Transcript excerpt-T140528032801
1 That is why it will never be achieved a unanimous consensus on everything on Earth because diversity is what makes creation.
2 For one to exist there must be a counterpart, an opposite, or reference point that distinguish one from the other.
3 Two identical metals molten and molded together will only be two of the same kind and not a new creation— as simple as that.
4 Two of the same equals one. If those two belong to the same source, and we all came from the same source, then we all are One in true essence.
5 But as humanity keeps not wanting to identify with the self and wanting to hold on to individuality, then the seeker will continue seeking at the wrong side of the word, the material world, the infinite world of creation, the ever-expanding source of creation itself.
End of Transcript excerpt T140528032801
This is Higher Truth from the Collective Forces of Knowledge and Wisdom as it’s been received, perceived and transcribed by Francisco Valentín.Copyright © Francisco Valentín 2014 All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
An abstract from the original transcriber, Francisco Valentin
This abstract comes from one of my longest Transcript. Because it addressed a vast number of subjects and due to the depth of those subjects, I had to split them in multiple excerpts. That is why although I broke it down in articles 1 to 5, that sequence will not correlate with the published full Transcript version I will have soon available for the advanced.
Articles 1 to 3, may be seen as a paradox between each other, but they are simply key facts before taking you to understand article 4.
Although we live in a world of creation, article 5 explains how we need to ultimately understand our true nature before we could start making a change in ourselves.
Once you understand that you are the individuality of God experiencing life through the physical senses, life begins to make sense once again.
That was the first thing I learned (but could not understand) when I went to the other side and back while in my car accident:
Once I died, I was no longer experiencing life through the physical senses and consequently my soul detached from my lifeless body.
You may call it soul or spirit, but I was none other than myself. With no name, no identification with the physical world, and no recollection of the past. I was just myself—as I’m still myself, thirty-nine years later.
It is not that it is wrong identifying oneself with the physical world, as it is written under article 5. It is the way we have learned to see the physical world what makes it wrong.
Once you identify with your true self, all the metaphors, analogies and stories will become meaningless as you grow in union with the self.
This Transcript goes well in accord to further explaining what I taught during the last half hour of the lecture I did at the Metaphysical Society of Sun City Center, Florida this past Wednesday.
For those who were not present in my latest lecture at the Metaphysical Society of Sun City Center, you may send me an email, and I will provide you with a copy of the slide presentation and the transcription of what took place.
Meanwhile:
Don’t keep me a secret and help me spread the word to unify the world into a new consciousness seeking to live in peace and equality while returning home. Please forward this Transcript to those you know might be willing to listen.
Thank you for sharing time with me.
—Francisco Valentin
Author and publisher of The Transcripts
Truth is one…interpretations many—Transcript
Share this post. The more we are, the faster the change into a new world.
And remember the last words from the First Transcript:
“We are one, and as you help me, you advance”—39First Transcript
Note: Transcripts and their abstracts have been written without formal editing. The beauty lies in the imperfection of its content, which keeps the integrity and original intent intact as the abstract is transcribed through the perceptive mind of the receiver. Editing its content may alter the original intent, thus, leading to misinterpretation. No third party shall interpret for others the true intent embedded in each Transcript other than the original transcriber, Francisco Valentín.
*Any word(s) written in parenthesis “( )” in any given Transcript means that the transcriber chose to clarify said preceding word, sentence or phrase by further explaining the true intent following said word. Example: vehicle (car)